Saturday, 18 June 2016

Why write about poetry (very drafty draft)


Why Write About Poetry

I'm writing about female authors of ancient epigram.
Terrible things are happening in the world.
If I finish the paper no one will read it.
If anyone did, what difference does it make?
Terrible things are happening in the world.

I’m writing about a few long-dead writers
Most of whose work was not preserved
Because they were female so nobody cared.
There was a brief warm blip of time
In the intellectual-friendly Hellenistic period
When a few female authors
Actually had a bit of an audience
And their work was copied
Enough times that we still have a little of it now.

Then they were gone. Their day was done.
Roman men, later,
Saved nothing Roman ladies wrote*.
They complained that female poets existed at all,
And actually spoke up at dinner parties
Expecting you to listen to their wretched drivel,
Can you believe it?

Maybe it was wretched drivel.
We’ve got no proof it wasn’t.

I’m supposed to write about this. It’s depressing.

Terrible things are happening in the world.
In that same sea around which my poets lived and wrote
In that same sea, 3000 migrants drowned last week,
Men, women, children,
The death ahead worth risking to escape the horrors behind.

How does a paper on long dead minor female poets matter?
Female poets no one reads,
Lucky few survivors from the crowd of all the female poets
No one will ever read again
Because they were not preserved.
Because nobody cared. Because female.
Loud-mouthed cows
Who didn’t even know enough
To shut their traps at dinner parties.

Meanwhile off the coast of Greece
Where Anyte wrote about dead pets, and temple dedications,
And children playing with a goat
And a mother weeping for her dead daughter
And girls who killed themselves to avoid rape
     after their city was sacked by Gauls
And a father weeping for another daughter
And a brave young man who died in combat
And several beautiful statues,
     Aphrodite, Hermes, a pretty Bacchic goat,
And pleasant spots to sit and enjoy the breeze -
Off that coast, thousands are drowning

And washing up on the shores of the Greek islands
Where Erinna wrote about her dead childhood friend
And Sappho, maybe it was Sappho,
Told us about a dead fisherman
And about a stone that marvellously speaks
 The name of her donor
     whenever you look at it -
Washing up on those shores,
Thousands of nameless dead, fleeing horrors

And sinking off the coast of southern Italy
Where Nossis wrote of love
And paintings that look just like
The women who dedicated them
And prayed for Artemis
To give her friend an easy childbirth
And dedicated to Hera a cloak she wove
     with her mother and grandmother
And asked to be remembered, like Sappho -

Sinking off that coast with full cargoes of the dead
Boat after leaky boat, overloaded,
Boats that should never have been put in the water
But people were desperate,
     their choices were gone

And in Byzantium, 

 Where Moero wrote about a cluster of grapes
Dedicated to Aphrodite
As if it were a daughter
 Mourned by a loving mother
And where she gave birth, also,
To a famous male tragedian
 None of whose work survives -
Byzantium suffers under a ruler
Who is still better than those around him,
Refugees flock TO Byzantium, not away
     for now

It’s never been easy, life around that sea
And yet these poets thought it was worthwhile
To spend their time writing about dedications, and friends,
And daughters dead too soon,
And spots one can sit for a moment
     and enjoy the view

Even though the next poem is about a soldier
Or a soldier’s horse,
Dead in the omnipresent wars

Perhaps if it was worth their while to write
It is worth my while to write about them,
And not to hate the men
Who hated them and all their sisters
For opening their mouths.

Perhaps it is worth my while
To do my part to make them remembered,
Even though no one will read me either,
Even though terrible things are happening.

Sappho lived through war and exile
But never talked about it. For her
The face of who you loved
Mattered more than anything at all.


***
*well, maybe one



Tuesday, 9 February 2016

This week: Gender Bias in Academe, and other things

Monday: Ideafest; panel on 'Myths of the Good Mother", in which I presented "Medea, the Good Mother". Very lively discussion!

Gender bias in academe is alive and well, as this set of studies -  Gender Bias in Academe: An Annotated Bibliography - demonstrates.

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

More convalescent reading (last week of June)

The Mysterious Affair at Styles
The Mysterious Affair at Styles (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Bunn, D. and Oke, J. (2009) The Centurion’s Wife. United States: Bethany House Publishers.

  • Another book given to me to read in hospital.  I confess that I read to scoff, but in the end enjoyed some aspects of the book. It was unfortunately written in the historical-romance genre, which rather got in the way of the book's intent, which was to tackle serious questions of faith. But it was well-researched, and except for the clumsy and bigoted depiction of Herod Antipas, not badly written.

Christie, A. (1970) The mysterious affair at Styles. Toronto: Bantam Books.

  •  I have figured out why I didn't like Agatha Christie as an adolescent.  I hated the wooden characters acting in apparently inexplicable ways and then suddenly doing something else entirely, out of character and equally inexplicable.  But I now see that the reason the characters and their actions appear inexplicable is not because Christie couldn't write, but - on the contrary - because she is deliberately telling the story through the eyes of a creation of sheer comic genius - Mr. Hastings, Poirot's companion, who is a complete idiot. It's a miracle he can tie his own shoes.  There are all kinds of clues that Hastings is a moron and that we are expected to spot this.  Of course the characters are wooden and inexplicable - to Hastings, who is hilariously self-absorbed, doesn't notice other characters except as they impinge on him, and isn't much interested in them anyway.   The clues are given to the rest of us even as they go whizzing by, miles over Hasting's head. He is a comic tour-de-force. When I was 13 I did not grasp the notion of an unreliable narrator and I missed all this.  I shall go look for more Christie novels.

Heyer, G. (1976) Pistols for Two. London: Pan Books, and Heyer, G. (1988) These Old Shades. Signet.

  • If you must read romances, read Heyer - anything except Footsteps In the Dark, which I think was her first and it was awful.  "Pistols for Two"is one of her Regencies, and is not quite as successful as most, because it's a collection of short stories that read pretty much like outlines for novels she never got around to fleshing out; still fun to read. "These Old Shades" is classic Heyer, equipped with everyone's favourite Villain Redeemed By The Love Of A Good Woman, the Duke of Avon.   Well-written, witty, and a pleasure to reread on a rainy afternoon.  And they always end happily, in that reassuring way romances have.

Monday, 22 June 2015

How beautifully our predecessors wrote

The van Bosch and van Lennep version of The Gr...
The van Bosch and van Lennep version of The Greek Anthology (in five vols., begun by Bosch in 1795, finished and published by Lennep in 1822). Photographed at The British Museum, London. Contains the metrical Latin version of Grotius's Planuedean (Planudes) version of the Anthology. Heavily illustrated. It also reprints the very error-prone Greek text of the Wechelian edition (1600) of the Anthology, which is itself simply a reprint of the 1566 Planudean edition by Henricus Stephanus. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Just happened on this wonderful line, describing a collection of archaizing poetry dating from the Byzantine period:

"There is much tenderness and beauty in many of the poems, but the writers wrote in a language which they did not command, but by which they were commanded, as all who try to write ancient Greek are."

(W.R. Paton, Greek Anthology v. 1, Harvard 1916: viii)

I wish we wrote or could write like this now.


Related articles

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Convalescent TV Part 2

The Convalescent (ca. 1923-1924) is one of a s...
The Convalescent (ca. 1923-1924) is one of a series of ten similar portraits (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Other things I've been watching while I recover:

British Crime Shows:

Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries

  • Elegant costume mysteries set in post-WW1 Australia.  The first season is knit together by Miss Fisher's quest to keep her little sister's murderer in jail.  The second season is less coherent, but still very entertaining, largely because of Miss Fisher, a wealthy, courageous, unconventional free spirit who is at all times gorgeously dressed (the series is all about the clothes, really).  Miss Fisher's determination to avoid male domination, in the form of exclusive relationships, plays against the romance the series wants to develop between Fisher & Jack Robinson, a determinedly monogamous and conventional police inspector.  We will see.

Foyle's War

  • Very wonderful WWII and post-WWII British series staring Inspector Foyle as a police inspector who dearly wants to serve in combat but is just too good at what he does - and consequently too likely to offend those in a position of power -  to be allowed to go to war; so instead he serves as chief of police in Hastings during the war, and is recruited into Intelligence thereafter. The seasons set during WWII are rather better, because Foyle's quiet but incandescent righteousness play better in a clearly black-and-white environment than in the morally gray Cold War.  The series does a good job of showing what Britain was really like in the war, and that the united home front that we are now told existed is a polite fiction.  

Inspector Gently

  • I liked this well enough to start reading the books, and it is better than the books - at least better than the early ones.  Martin Shaw is phenomenal as the - again - incandescently righteous  George Gently (I have a taste for uncompromisingly moral heroes), and his sidekick, Sergeant Bacchus, is unusual in this sort of series in that while not corrupt yet, he is weak and self-serving enough that one can see how he could go that way.  The sub-plot of the whole series is Gently's re-parenting of Bacchus, to turn him into a good officer.   And it's set in Durham.  I love Durham.  Would love to go back there.

Ripper Street

  • The tone of this series, starring Matthew McFadyen as a police inspector and that guy that plays Bronn in Game of Thrones as his sergeant, is very much based on the Sherlock Holmes starring Robert Downey Jr - the same jangly soundtrack and penchant for unnecessary violence, particularly but not exclusively by the carefully labelled Americans (who also have a penchant for guns).  Set in late-Victorian England, in Whitechapel. The acting and sets are excellent but it's too anachronistic and violent for me.  Not every problem can be solved by shooting, punching or knifing someone; and the plots seem otherwise improbable, too.  However, I have to say the acting is brilliant and I still watch the occasional episode.

Jack Taylor

  • This series is a waste of Iain Glen.  I watched one episode and he did his best, but I have never seen a set of lazy writing clichĂ©s and character stereotypes shuffle so hastily to an uninteresting conclusion.  Set in more or less modern Ireland.  I gather it's based on a series of novels that I am grateful to be forewarned not to bother to read.

Miscellany:

Grand Hotel

  • This was recommended to me, I don't remember by whom.  It's in Spanish with subtitles for those (like me) who don't have any Spanish.  It is essentially a well-produced Spanish tele-romance soap opera.  I was expecting a well-produced Spanish murder mystery, so it didn't suit my tastes.  It was interesting, though, how easily one can spot the conventions of a genre one doesn't like.  Class warfare was very important, as was the ability of the extraordinarily handsome young male protagonist to move in both worlds (upper crust and servant class).  And there was the inflexible upper-class matron forcing her daughter (obviously destined to be the male protagonist's love interest) into a loveless marriage with the sinister upper-crust hotel manager, and the largely virtuous servants, some of whom were comic relief, and one quisling servant who is in the pay of the privileged upper-class bad guy ... and so on. One episode was enough to tell me it wasn't my thing - actually, 10 minutes of one episode, but I watched the rest out of respect for the film makers. I liked Grand Budapest Hotel better but then, it was brilliant.  

Slings and Arrows

  • Brilliant Paul Gross series about (obviously) the Stratford Festival; hilarious.  I've just started season 1 but so far it's wonderful.  Why didn't anyone tell me?

Friday, 19 June 2015

Maps

I've always loved maps, knowing where things are, possibly because I have no spatial sense at all and can't really visualize the world without one.  Here is a map I have just cobbled up, showing all the locations mentioned by female authors of epigram:


Red = Anyte
Green = Erinna
Blue = Nossis.  
Droplet = we are to assume that the author was there
Diamond shape = Author mentions the location but not as if she has seen or visited it herself.

Sunday, 14 June 2015

Convalescent TV

The Convalescent
The Convalescent (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Thank heavens for Netflix and DVDs.  Another of the pleasures of sick leave: testing out an episode or two of everything and then binge-watching the ones I like.  Here is a brief review of how I've been wasting my time in front of the tube (while doing my exercises! and folding laundry!)

Series based on comic books:

Marvel:

Daredevil

  • This was a really well-done series.  Excellent female characters (Karen the secretary, Vanessa the love interest, Elena the determined old lady, Gao the crime lord),  which flesh out the canonical comic-book males (Matt Murdock, Foggy, Wilson Fisk), who can be human while the canonical figures start out rather black-and-white.  Matt Murdock is particularly well done because though he is the superhero protagonist, he is not superhuman.  He is a good fighter but he can be beaten and when he is wounded the marks will still be there 3 episodes later, knife-wounds breaking open if he tries to do too much, bruises still visible on his face, moving stiffly and not up to as much in the next fight.  He can interpret sounds and smells and so on better than others but he's still blind and it's not perfect.  Emotional consequences are not shrugged off; if someone lies, three episodes later they still aren't trusted by those they lied to. Matt Murdock's insistence on going and beating people up, and getting beaten up, is clearly shown to be obsessive and irrational; these decisions are questionable and should be questioned.  And very well acted and produced; dark and scary.  I'm glad it's been renewed and I'm sorry I've finished off the first season already.

DC:

All of these are considerably more cartoonish than "Daredevil", meant for a younger (I'm guessing) audience.  They've done an interesting thing and pitched the 4 shows to different age-groups, trying for a spread across the whole demographic.  These are in order of target-age group as far as I can guess:

Flash

  • Teen romance, well played by the engaging lead, Grant Gustin, and the equally engaging lead villain, Harrison Wells.  Painted in very broad strokes. Made a point of introducing not only a gay super villain but also a gay heroic ordinary human, Captain Singh, who has a good relationship with his male fiancĂ©.  I particularly liked that in a teen-targeted show.

Arrow

  • Mid-twenties bromance with girls. Spectacular protagonist, and filmed in Vancouver; the Queen mansion was filmed on Vancouver Island (I was sure I'd recognized it!) Engaging enough that I bought the 3rd season on iTunes, but there is a terrible hole in the show, which is the female lead, played by Katie Cassidy, who is cardboard.  I have spent 2 seasons wondering why they haven't killed her off when they have killed off so many much more interesting characters.  I will probably finish watching the 3rd season but honestly, I can't stand watching that actor.  


Gotham

  • Same age group as "Constantine" but for different tastes - for an audience who likes black-and-white moral tales. Not as good as Daredevil (Gotham = NY which makes the comparison inevitable). But doing something very different.  For one thing, it's a cartoon where Daredevil is an attempt to make it real. One clearly-marked bisexual female character; more hinted at. Lush production, well acted.  I haven't got round to watching more than the first few episodes though.

Constantine

  • Early thirties audience, people old enough to have some real regrets. Really good so far (3 episodes in). Matt Ryan is excellent as the disreputable, entertaining, chain-smoking (so we know he's not morally trustworthy) protagonist who lives in the gray zone.  He isn't as obviously bisexual as John Constantine is in the comics, and they seem to be setting up a romance with a woman, which I disapprove of because too obvious.  But the series is still worth watching.

Science Fiction/Fantasy:

Orphan Black

  • The series that convinced me that Joss Whedon is not the only TV writer to watch.* Orphan Black is a SPECTACULAR SHOW, carried entirely by the excellent writing and the amazing, really amazing, lead actress.  I am only part-way through the first season.  Everyone should go watch Orphan Black right now. You will not be disappointed. 

Game of Thrones

  • I avoided watching this for the longest time because I read Sady Doyle's article on Tigerbeatdown, which pointed out that there was a lot of misogyny, sexism, rape as tool to motivate positive character change in women, and also racism in Game of Thrones. And then I read her follow-up article on a reaction to that article; and then I read her follow-up a couple of months later on the spectacularly brutal and violent personal threats she had been receiving by the thousands since she wrote the first article.  And at this point I thought, I don't want to be in any way associated with any of the people who have been attacking Sady Doyle because eww, these people are creeps, so if they like Game of Thrones I likely won't. But eventually I started watching it anyway and although I wish it weren't, it is awesome.  I am enjoying it very much indeed.  Mostly because of Peter Dinklage/Tyrion Lannister, who has not raped anyone so far and is not particularly misogynistic either, though he may be racist.  But also I like Catelyn Stark, and Ned Stark, and every other Stark.  I gather it would be very foolish of me to get too attached to any Stark however.  (So far only one is dead, but I'm only halfway through season 3). 

*In fact, after Age of Ultron and Agents of Shield (though I like Agents of Shield), I have regretfully recycled my "Joss Whedon is My Master Now" T-shirt.  Not that he is not skilled and tells good stories, but he has been toiling in the Marvel mines for a long time now, and I would like to see him telling his own stories again.  I am just not the target market for 4-hour fight scenes (though, for some reason, I loved them in Mad Max).

Next week: British crime series; and miscellaneous other series.